COLUMBIA, S.C. (FOX Carolina) - The South Carolina Supreme Court announced it has amended the rules for judicial disciplinary ...

A federal appeals court on Wednesday sided with the Trump administration and halted for now a lower court's order that had kept in place temporary protections for 60,000 migrants from Central America ...

Brazil's federal police said messages found on the telephone of former President Jair Bolsonaro showed he once wanted to flee ...

Arizona tribal leaders reacted angrily after President Donald Trump said their opposition to a copper mine was un-American.

Texas cannot require public schools in Houston, Austin and other select districts to display the Ten Commandments in every ...

More than 700 people are scheduled to share their opinions and criticism this week around the EPA’s plan to toss the key ...

The attorneys challenging the new state law hope that other school districts won’t implement it after a federal judge found ...

In states with abortion bans like Idaho's, some advocates say looming Medicaid cuts could further restrict maternal and reproductive healthcare.

The Supreme Court previously ruled in the 1934 case Humphrey’s Executor v. United States that Congress could lawfully extend for-cause removal protections to the heads of certain agencies.

If it resists and is ignored, it will have weakened the institution for generations. But if it doesn’t resist this remaking now, when could it?

Credit: Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States President Donald Trump is having another banner year at the U.S. Supreme Court.