The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
10hon MSN
So what are shield laws exactly, and what does the future hold for them? TIME spoke to experts to find out.
A new trigger bill moving its way through the Wyoming Legislature that aims to ban abortion in the event the Wyoming Supreme ...
In our news wrap Monday, a federal judge declined to give the Associated Press its spot back in the White House press pool ...
Patients who undergo a medication abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy are at a significantly higher risk of experiencing severe pain and heavy bleeding than if they had surgical abortions ...
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
On Monday, the Supreme Court handed abortion rights advocates a rare win when they declined to take up a pair of cases ...
A lawsuit filed by 17 states, including Alabama, challenging federal rules entitling workers to time off and other ...
A Howard County woman sentenced to 30 years in prison for killing her newborn baby will get a new trial, the Supreme Court of ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback