The financial balance of U.S. states faces a significant challenge as recent federal policies shift the responsibility and costs of essential social programs onto their budgets. The question is not if ...

The Trump administration's recent cuts to Medicaid and SNAP are forcing states to reassess financial priorities, as federal ...

States, already facing cuts to services by Trump administration, now trying to figure out how to fit Medicaid and SNAP cuts ...

The price tag of Medicaid and SNAP climbs automatically because benefit formulas are tied to inflation and the cost of ...

There are some projected savings, but Connecticut will see some significant fiscal impacts under the new federal law.

In fiscal year 2023, the combination of expiring federal COVID-19 pandemic aid, slowing tax revenue growth, and rising costs for Medicaid led to an increase in the share of state revenue dedicated ...

The bill, ushered through Congress by Republican leadership and signed by Trump Friday, includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, ...

Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Baird discusses Medicaid and SNAP changes in an interview with News 8, focusing on preserving programs for people who truly need them.

North Carolina Republicans supported Trump’s bill that cuts Medicaid and SNAP despite representing ... terminate Medicaid expansion if the state is forced to pick up additional costs. ...

Alabama Arise said the new cost-sharing for SNAP would cost Alabama about $200 million if it was implemented now. The bill also imposes new 80-hour a month work requirements on many SNAP recipients.

The Medicaid cuts recently approved by Congress and President Donald Trump could force states into difficult decisions, ...

Missouri currently pays about 35% of the cost of covering about 900,000 people covered by traditional Medicaid. Anyone who is enrolled now in the expansion group would be covered with a 90% ...