The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a South Carolina woman and Planned Parenthood do not have a legal right, known as standing, to bring a lawsuit challenging South Carolina’s […] ...

Patients do not have legal standing to sue if a state denies their right to see their preferred medical provider, the court said in a 6-3 ruling.

A new ruling, supported by six of the Supreme Court's nine judges, will also allow states to cut off reimbursements to Planned Parenthood for many low-income Americans.

The Alliance Defending Freedom claimed that states should be able to redirect Medicaid monies away from the abortion business and toward legitimate health care providers who provide a wide range of ...

That provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed by the Republican-led Congress denied certain tax-exempt ...

The Supreme Court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money ... The case centers on funding for other health care services Planned Parenthood provides in South Carolina, but the ruling could have ...

This term of the U.S. Supreme Court seems to have brought a sense of unity for the six conservative justices delivering a ...

This case began in 2018 when South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster, a Republican, signed an executive order blocking Medicaid funding from flowing to Planned Parenthood South Atlantic.